tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3134951188562593571.post2197660375812264681..comments2018-05-07T01:41:35.514+08:00Comments on yaw-yaw ni teban: what's in a name: tops, bottoms, and versatiles?Niel Stevehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16864131780882552756noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3134951188562593571.post-13428846969460829712011-04-05T17:27:39.520+08:002011-04-05T17:27:39.520+08:00good going teban :)good going teban :)Spiral Princehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17923684457155563205noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3134951188562593571.post-6266194744083892372011-04-05T15:44:09.104+08:002011-04-05T15:44:09.104+08:00i agree. love solve will solve the problem. :)i agree. love solve will solve the problem. :)Jpy Deehttp://dreaminginsidethecloset.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3134951188562593571.post-44731364605599302442011-04-05T11:32:24.398+08:002011-04-05T11:32:24.398+08:00just another thought, there has been recent (well,...just another thought, there has been recent (well, not THAT recent, but recent in terms of scholarly work) findings showing the rise of the phenomena of the power-bottom and the femme-top/submissive top. interesting summary of results, niel. ---tylerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3134951188562593571.post-35685006795330637612011-04-05T06:09:14.579+08:002011-04-05T06:09:14.579+08:00Is there such a thing as a versa-top?Is there such a thing as a versa-top?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3134951188562593571.post-20096301135474422002011-04-05T05:50:09.517+08:002011-04-05T05:50:09.517+08:00being the penetrator or the penetrated is not an i...being the penetrator or the penetrated is not an issue that can be viewed solely in gay sexual relations. historically, anal and oral sexual penetration by men WITH men did not carry any gay connotations. in fact, there was a more militaristic flavor to the endeavor. to penetrate is to conquer and to be penetrated is to be demasculinized. it was how victors further humiliated and de-empowered their captors, a sort of psychological attack to their selfhood as being totally under the victor's power. it was only after patriarchal religions arose that any penetrations other than vaginal-penile were considered taboo, and were relegated to the outcasted minorities (e.g., gays) of the times. across time, these same minorities internalized generations of religious and conservative moral programming. on the bright side, these "programmes" have been accepted as they are and owned by this population and celebrated as a variant of sexuality. an example of such celebration is the fact that many authors of the gay religious experience declare that the indigenous form of a truly gay religion cannot exist without the dynamics between the fascination with the male body and how sex is approached...sorry wala koy elaborate references, just typed out what i thought.---tylerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com